ONDCP Seal
Skip NavigationPublicationsONDCP Mast
Search Contact Podcast Mobile Web Blog ONDCP Mast Skip Navigation
ONDCP Web Site About ONDCP News and Public Affairs Policy Drug Facts Publications Related Links
Prevention Treatment Science and Technology Enforcement State and Local International Funding
Pulse Check
National Trends in Drug Abuse
Spring 1996

Description of Sources

Ethnographic Sources

Seventeen ethnographers, epidIiologists, and other ethnographic sources from urban areas were interviewed for this issue of Pulse Check. Ethnography is a qualitative research technique which, unlike highly structured observation methods, observes and records activity "on its own terms," that is, without predetermined ideas. Ethnography is not undercover work. Rather, the ethnographer, who is fully revealed as a social science researcher, enters the drug userūs world to record and describe it.

The ethnographic sources contacted by Pulse Check this quarter include some of the best known drug researchers in the country. In some cases, they are trained ethnographers; in other cases, they are epidIiologists with access to ethnographic information; a few are social researchers working in a field site collecting ethnographic data.

Police Sources

Police sources are drawn from the Abt staff's existing contacts within law enforcement and from contacts developed through the recommendations of law enforcement agencies. These sources are typically officers working on special squads, narcotics task forces, and DEA agents. This round of calls reached police sources in ten cities.

Treatment Providers

The sample of treatment providers is derived from the directory of programs compiled by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). The NIDA listings are divided into four regions that have a similar number of treatment programs and are treated equally for sampling. The original sample based on the 1991 National Drug Abuse Treatment Unit Survey has been updated using the more recent NIDA files. From each region, 20 to 25 programs are identified, 10 are contacted, and the rIainder serve as replacIents. The samples are stratified to include equal numbers of small (under 100 clients) and large programs. This round of calls reached 50 treatment providers. The states in each region are listed below.

  • Region I: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Vermont, Pennsylvania

    Region II: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, Washington, D.C., West Virginia

  • Region III: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota

  • Region IV: Colorado, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, Arizona, California, Idaho, New Mexico, Washington, Oregon








PRIVACY POLICY | SITE MAP | DISCLAIMER | ACCESSIBILITY




Last Updated: March 4, 2002